Pro I-1183
by Caleb Mathena
Simply put, Initiative-1183 essentially privatizes the sale of liquor in Washington State (or allows stores that are not state owned to sell liquor,) doubles the fine on selling liquor to minors, and increases the regulations required for businesses to even sell spirits. Both sides of this issue will argue about the “facts” on I-1183, but in reality, both only have theories as to what they believe may happen if this legislation is passed.
The “no” sides stance is primarily based on the common good of the community. They believe that I-1183 will present more opportunities for minors to obtain alcohol and thus, increase the teenage death rate. They also state that this initiative is just another excuse for big businesses to take the people’s money using the 27% tax that comes with buying liquor.
These reasons are unwarranted and misinformed, however, the statements that are made could sway uninformed people.
I-1183 comes with strict specifications that a business has to meet before even being considered to become a legal vendor of liquor. The store has to occupy a certain amount of space and is required to be enclosed. The vendor must also have a clean record as far as not having a history of selling liquor to minors. This means that gas station convenience stores will not be allowed to sell hard alcohol because of the small space they take up.
Furthermore, I-1183 will eliminate government involvement in our businesses and remove the monopoly it has on liquor sales. Revenues from these sales will increase and more money will be circulated through our community. All in all, this initiative is against large government and promotes the small businesses and the people of Washington.
Con I-1183
by Jason Hirschey
Dough, moolah, coin, greenbacks, cash. Whatever you call it, money steers government. It is a sad truth and it is definitely not what the Founding Fathers wanted. They probably never considered that Costco would donate $22.7 million to pass Initiative-1183.
I-1183 won, a huge blow to American freedom. Many extend the thanks to Costco for leading the charge. And the truth is, Costco did contribute more than it should have.
Costco is the role model for other big corporations looking to buy an election. More than anything, I-1183 should have been snubbed to stick it to megacorporations.
Costco bought the votes and I-1183 passed. Not only is liquor become more readily available, underage drinking increases, and megacorporations (i.e. Costco, Walmart, Safeway) monopolize the liquor industry, but elections are auctions. And which megacorporation is next? Big oil? Tobacco? Disney? China?
If Costco is truly concerned about the wellbeing of the state, why not donate some money to the state’s crazy debt? The WSDOT, parks department, public health, and education could use some money. Instead, services are being guillotined, but Costco would rather drink itself into oblivion.
Washingtonians cannot be fooled by Costco’s tricky antics. They must stand to preserve good ol’ fashioned American freedom and fight the megacorporations.
The Occupy movements are not resisting capitalism as much as they are resisting megacorporations. Nobody has a problem with mom-and-pop shops, rather the bad apples are the Costcos, Walmarts, and McDonalds of the world. They suffocate small businesses and force legislation to suit them. Sound familiar?
Costco has no right to buy an election. If it was a good idea, there would not be a need for huge, record-breaking donations; it would simply pass by the voters’ wish. I-1183 is the gateway drug to a world run by megacorporations, a world run by Donald Trumps, Bernie Madoffs, and Mark Zuckerbergs.